Licentiate seminar with Linda Pipkorn: The automation effect: Investigating factors that influence the driver response process to a safety-relevant event during assisted driving and after unsupervised automation

Date
16 June 2020 13:15–14:30
Place
Zoom

You are all welcome to Linda Pipkorn’s licentiate seminar! Linda Pipkorn is a PhD student in the group Crash Analysis and Prevention within Vehicle Safety division at Chalmers University of Technology. Her research focus is on human collaboration with automated vehicles and is within the EU-project L3pilot. The aim of the research is to model how automated vehicles should behave in specific situations to meet human expectations and not trespass human comfort boundaries.

The title of the seminar is: The automation effect: Investigating factors that influence the driver response process to a safety-relevant event during assisted driving and after unsupervised automation. This research was performed within the SAFER project L3Pilot, Piloting Automated Driving on European Roads.

The supervision team has been Marco Dozza, Trent Victor, and Emma Tivesten and the discussion leader will be Annika Larsson, Senior Principal Researcher Human Factors, at Veoneer.

Abstract
Introduction: Safe vehicle automation can be achieved through a detailed understanding of drivers’ ability to respond to a safety-relevant event after a period of automated driving. For instance, there is a need to understand in which scenarios automation effects are present (e.g. delayed response, degraded driving performance, crashing). Further, there is a need to identify specific factors (e.g. test environment, system-prompts, hands-on-wheel requirement, automation duration) that contribute to or prevent these automation effects. Objectives: The aim of this thesis is to investigate factors that influence: (a) automation effects in a safety-relevant event on test track during assisted driving  when no system-prompt is issued prior to the event and (b) automation aftereffects (i.e. automation effects specifically occurring after automation has been deactivated) in a safety-relevant event on test track after unsupervised automation when a system-prompt is issued prior to the event. Method: Two Wizard-of-Oz test-track experiments were performed in order to investigate the driver response process in safety-relevant events. In experiment 1, the drivers were required to supervise (with or without a hands-on-wheel requirement) an assisted driving system, and then respond to a safety-relevant event without being notified by the system. In experiment 2, the drivers drove manually (baseline) and with an unsupervised automation system (a short and a long duration) before being presented to a safety-relevant event. The automation system prompted the driver to resume manual driving shortly before the safety-relevant event became visible. Results: In experiment 1, one third of the drivers responded late, or did not act at all, and crashed in the non-prompted safety-relevant event. In fact, the drivers crashed to the same extent and responded similarly independent of if they supervised the assisted driving system with or without hands on the wheel. In experiment 2, all drivers resumed manual control and did not collide in the safety-relevant event, both after a short and a long automation duration. All drivers showed a similar response and driving performance in the safety-relevant event for both long and short automation duration as well as in the manual baseline. Discussion: A hands-on-wheel requirement was not found to prevent late response or crashing in a non-prompted safety-relevant event encountered during assisted driving. More work is needed to understand the potential safety-benefits of a hands-on-wheel requirement in other types of conflicts and for driver distractions. The finding of minor automation aftereffects in experiment 2 contrasts to previous driving simulator studies. The reason may be the different test environments but is more likely due to different timings for prompting the drivers to resume manual control in relation to when the safety-relevant event became visible. Conclusions: Safe vehicle automation, including both assisted and unsupervised automation, can be achieved in a realistic environment on test track for most drivers. However, assisted driving in combination with a non-prompted safety-relevant event, can be detrimental for safety, since some drivers may not understand the need to respond to avoid a crash. In fact, a hands-on-wheel requirement did not result in earlier steering responses nor preventing drivers from crashing. Thus, more work is needed to understand how to make sure drivers understand the need to respond in non-prompted safety-relevant events during assisted driving. In fact, it seems that when automation has matured to a level when it can prompt the drivers (i.e. unsupervised automation that can prompt the driver to take over) prior to a safety-relevant event becomes visible, drivers are able to safely resume manual control and perform similar as  after an extended period of manual driving. Such safe driving performance seems to be independent of automation durations below 15 minutes.

Connection details

To join, please use the link below, the virtual meeting room will be opened at 13:00.

Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://chalmers.zoom.us/j/63120641193
Or iPhone one-tap :
    Sweden: +46850500829,,63120641193#  or +46850520017,,63120641193#
Or Telephone:
     If you have problems with +46 7 6692 0434 in Sweden please dial +46 8 4468 2488 instead.
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
        Sweden: +46 8 5050 0829  or +46 8 5052 0017  or +46 850 539 728  or +46 8 4468 2488  or +46 8 5050 0828
        US: +1 669 900 6833  or +1 253 215 8782  or +1 301 715 8592  or +1 312 626 6799  or +1 346 248 7799  or +1 408 638 0968  or +1 408 652 8184  or +1 646 876 9923
        United Kingdom: +44 208 080 6591  or +44 208 080 6592  or +44 330 088 5830  or +44 131 460 1196  or +44 203 481 5237  or +44 203 481 5240
        Norway: +47 7349 4877  or +47 2396 0588
        Denmark: +45 32 72 80 10  or +45 32 72 80 11  or +45 89 88 37 88  or +45 32 70 12 06  or +45 32 71 31 57
    Meeting ID: 631 2064 1193
    International numbers available: https://chalmers.zoom.us/u/cdQRUmkUkb
Or an H.323/SIP room system:
    H.323: 109.105.112.236 or 109.105.112.235
    Meeting ID: 631 2064 1193
    SIP: 63120641193@109.105.112.236 or 63120641193@109.105.112.235

 

Contact
Marco Dozza
Email
marco.dozza [at] chalmers.se

Safer – Vehicle and Traffic Safety Centre

SAFER is the open research arena where researchers and expertise work together to create safe mobility. Our traffic safety approach covers people, vehicles and the infrastructure – and together we contribute to safer road transports and smarter, more sustainable cities.

Contact information

SAFER

Lindholmspiren 3A
SE-417 56 Göteborg
Sweden

 +46 31-772 21 06
 safer [at] chalmers.se