Publication

Purpose

The risk of submarining during automotive crashes, defined by the lap belt sliding off the pelvis to load the abdomen, is predicted to increase in future autonomous vehicles as greater variation in seating position is enabled. Biofidelic tools are required to efficiently design and evaluate new and/or improved safety systems. This study aims to evaluate the pelvis response sensitivity to variations in boundary conditions that directly influence the pelvis loads, deemed important for the submarining outcome, to facilitate a more precise comparison between finite element human body models (FE-HBMs) and post-mortem human subjects (PMHSs).

Methods

A parameter study, using a one-variable-at-a-time analysis (low/high) of belt friction, seat friction, seat stiffness, and (on/off) for added belt bending stiffness, was performed using a state-of-the-art FE-HBM in four different test scenarios; one stationary, two sleds with upright occupant posture, and one sled with reclined occupant posture.

Results

In the stationary scenario, both belt friction and belt bending stiffness influenced the belt folding behavior, which consequently affected the belt-to-pelvis angle at submarining. In the sled scenarios, only seat friction was found to influence the pelvis kinematics and submarining outcome, with the most biofidelic response resulting from both the low (0.2) and high (0.5) friction coefficient depending on the scenario.

Conclusion

To reduce uncertainty in boundary conditions affecting the external pelvis loads and increase confidence in FE-HBM to PMHS comparisons, it is recommended that future experiments evaluate the PMHS to seat friction coefficient and that new belt modeling methods that accurately capture belt folding when interacting with soft tissues are developed.